Anyone who
knows me knows that I have (had?) a very strong opinion about Vista. I felt that it was released way too early with far too many bugs. Early adopters and new PC buyers were essentially an expanded beta test of software that was not ready for the mass market.
Worse, Microsoft turned a blind eye to many of the problems for months... insisting reports of poor performance and stability issues were
isolated incidents or vendor specific. Regardless of who you believe (every columnist/user in the country or the company that produced the OS), Vista had issues. No doubt.
I bit the bullet relatively early and used Vista (along with one of my business partners) for about six months for my office PC. It's probably important to remember that we are a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner, giving us access to all the latest and greatest MS software. In addition, being a tech company, I really don't skimp when it comes to my own equipment, and I replace my laptop about once a year. It's good to stay ahead of the curve in my business so when customers have questions, I have answers.
It was a disaster, that I stuck with it for six months is a testimony to how much I'll suffer for our industry. It was
reminiscent of Windows ME, and if you don't remember that little gem there is a reason why. Simply put, to an IT person, it just didn't exist (kind of like Microsoft BOB which was supposed to
revolutionize the user interface). It came between Windows 98 and 2000 and was laughable.
Vista was slow to boot, and after log on, my computer was completely useless for at least 15-20 minutes (no
exaggeration, I timed it). I did every bit of tuning that could possibly be done, and still it was a mess. It wasn't even CPU utilization so much as hard disk utilization. It would just sit there and bang away forever for some
unknown reason. Disabling search services and all
start up items didn't seem to help.
Then there was the copying of files. Windows suddenly decided that it had to examine every file copy operation. Even copying small files from my PC to the network would take 10-20 minutes for no good reason. It would just say "calculating" forever. I didn't need to know how long it would take, I just needed to copy the silly thing. It's not like I was going to change my mind about copying a file. I needed it to get from point A to point B, just move the silly thing.
Don't even get me started on the "security," which is a nice way to say "Rather than actually secure all the flaws in our OS, we're just not going to let you do anything useful with your computer without jumping through a million hurdles." Plus, they removed Telnet &
Hyperterminal. I'm in IT, I
need Telnet for troubleshooting. They said it was because it is insecure. That may be, but no one in the world who knows how to use Telnet is going to do anything stupid, and it's only 200K, so it doesn't even waste much space. Yes, I know SSH is safer, and I use it for many operations... but I can troubleshoot mail flow issues a lot faster with Telnet than logging in to a bunch of servers.
Plus, I had problems with application timeouts, crashes, or just flat out not starting up like they should. There were all kinds of compatibility issues, even with modern stuff.
Finally, one Saturday in October, we had a downgrading party and went back to
XP and Office 2003. It was a happy day and like getting together with an old friend again. Happiness with my computer was once again a way of life, not just wishful thinking.
Then, Microsoft finally released Service Pack 1. Dare I try it again? Well, since my whole business revolves around Microsoft-based software, I felt it was my duty. Sometimes you just have to jump out in front of the line of fire.
I'm happy to say though, Service Pack 1 for Vista fixed ALL of the problems I had. I've been running smoothly ever since. Copying files is smooth, the security issues were worked out, and it is fast, fast, fast on the same hardware. Fast boots and fast shutdowns. Finally, I can use it for business and feel like it is an improvement over
XP.
Should you try it? Well, I am a pretty firm believer that you should only move to Vista if you have a good, modern PC that is less than a year old and preferably a PC that was not the cheapest one available when you bought it (what can I say, quality matters).
Despite my affiliation with and dependence on Microsoft, know that I am a pretty demanding consumer. If I'm happier with Vista than with
XP, there is probably something to be said for that.